"There are something like twenty thousand CofE places of worship in this country
and of those far more than half are ancient buildings, that is to say each represents
the gradual growth of a community. They are the history of English art displayed
in living form, and most country churches have far more to tell to those who will
look than have the local museums."
from Art in Living Form by John Betjeman
CLOSING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS: 27th February 2009
The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings invites entries for a competition
to honour the memory of Sir John Betjeman, and to mark his membership of The Society’s
Committee from 1954 to 1977. The award will be made for repair to the fabric of
buildings currently in religious use and which were built as churches and chapels
in England and Wales. The work must have been completed during the previous 18
months.
The intention is to reward excellence and the highest level of conservation craftsmanship
and to allow the winning repair work to be presented as an example to others.
The award itself will take the form of a specially commissioned print by John
Piper of a church much loved by Sir John Betjeman, with a suitable inscription.
The winner will be announced at the Society’s AGM in the summer; in Cornerstone,
the Society’s magazine; and on the SPAB website.
St. James Church, Dauntsey –Winner of the 2007 John Betjeman
Award
CONDITIONS
1. Entry forms are available on application to the SPAB, 37 Spital Square, London,
E1 6DY, or can be downloaded from the Society’s website
www.spab.org.uk. They should normally be signed by the Incumbent or Churchwardens in respect
of Anglican buildings, by the Bishop or Priest in respect of Roman Catholic buildings,
or by the Minister or Elders in respect of Non-Conformist buildings, or their
equal equivalents in the case of other faiths. Cathedrals are not eligible.
2. The entry form should carry a brief description of the repair or conservation
project carried out. If the application is shortlisted, the judges are likely
to request more detailed information about it. Reference should be made to the
criteria listed below. The form should be accompanied by a small selection of
photographs, showing the project before and after.
3. The award is for a specific repair to a single element of the building and
not a general programme of works. Work of repair on any scale will be eligible,
but it must be to the fabric of the building (e.g. spires, towers, roofs, walls,
floors, windows, etc.), or to internal fixed or freestanding significant furnishings
(e.g. murals, monuments, screens, tombs, fixed pews, pulpits, etc). Ordinary repairs
are eligible.
4. Work that enlarges an ecclesiastical building or rearranges its internal space
to accommodate alternative uses will not be eligible.
5. The work must have been completed during the previous 18 months.
6. All submissions will be examined by three judges at SPAB, and a shortlist
prepared. The judges are chosen by the Guardians and will visit the short-listed
building in the company of a representative of the applicant.
7. The winner may be required to submit, without a fee, a 1500 word article suitable
for publication in Cornerstone, the Society’s magazine, and supported by adequate
illustrations, and provide two A2 size portrait display boards for exhibition
purposes.
8. The award is made to the church or chapel and not to any individual responsible
for the work.
9. All applications to be made in hard copy and delivered to SPAB.
10. The judges’ decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.
INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS
The judges will be looking for work that is firmly based on the principles of
conservative repair advocated by the SPAB since 1877.
Among other criteria they will be looking to see:
• A reasoned argument for the need for the repair work, including the philosophical
basis for the repairs proposed
• Repair techniques formulated in response to a detailed analysis of the problems
• The appropriateness and honesty of the solution adopted – materials and detailing
• The extent to which loss of original fabric was limited during the work
• The extent to which “restoration” was avoided
• The quality of craftsmanship and materials used
• Adequate recording and/or monitoring of the work in progress
• The effect of the repair on the rest of the building
A shortlist will be made following a review of the initial information submitted.
The architectural quality of the building is less important than the quality of
the repair. It is not essential that the building is listed as being of architectural
interest.